After SCOTUS Chevron Decision, States Should Publish Federal Guidance
Though guidance documents are ostensibly not legally binding on regulated parties, in practice they often carry the force of law and contribute to the overregulation that defines the modern federal administrative state. Many of these guidance documents are sent to states to express the federal government’s views on the state’s obligations and programs they co-administer. Essentially, arcane federal guidance documents often affect state laws and policies.
The number of guidance documents currently in force (and, for that matter, the total number ever issued) is unknown. In short, there is a complete lack of transparency vital to the functioning of a free society when not even an issuing agency—much less the regulated public—knows where a particular guidance document is housed, or whether it still reflects an agency’s current legal position.
- AFP Foundation
- Beacon Center of Tennessee
- Better Cities Project
- Goldwater Institute
- National Taxpayers Union
- Texas Public Policy Foundation